Fixed Point Theory and Applications | Full text | Common fixed point and approximation results for generalized (f,g) weak contractions

18 Май 2014 | Author: | Комментарии к записи Fixed Point Theory and Applications | Full text | Common fixed point and approximation results for generalized (f,g) weak contractions отключены
Sessa 26

Common fixed and approximation for generalized f . )-weak contractions

Corresponding author: R Khan

Author Affiliations

Department of University of Sargodha, Pakistan

Department of and Statistics, Fahd University Petroleum Minerals, Saudi Arabia

is an Access article under the of the Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), permits unrestricted distribution, and in any provided the work is cited.

Abstract

existence of fixed points established for mappings where is generalized f . )-weakly contractive on a subset of Banach space. applications, the approximation results proved. Our unify and several recent in the

Keywords:

common point; Banach pair; generalized f . )-weakly contractive generalized ( . g maps; invariant

1. Introduction preliminaries

We review needed Let ( . d be a space. A T . → X called weakly if, for x . ∈ X

where ϕ [0, ∞ → [0, ) is lower semicontinuous from right that ϕ positive on ∞ ) ϕ (0) 0.

where . g X → are self-mappings ϕ . ∞ ) [0, ∞ is a semicontinuous function right such ϕ is on (0, ) and (0) = If g f . T is f-weakly contractive If f I . identity operator, T is weakly contractive Note that g = = I ϕ is nondecreasing, then definition of f . )-weakly contractive is same the one appeared in ,2 ]. if f I and ( t = (1 k ) for a k with k 1, an f contractive mapping called a . Also that if = g I and is lower from the then ψ t ) t — ( t is upper from the and the (1.1) is by

d x. T ≤ ψ x. y.

( f g )-weakly maps for ϕ is semicontinuous from right are the type Boyd and [3 ]. if we k ( ) = — ϕ t ) for t and k = 0 with f g = . then condition (1.1) replaced by

d T T y k d y d y.

Therefore f . )-weakly contractive are closely to the studied by and Takahashi ].

If ( t = (1 k ) for a k with k 1, an ( . g contractive mapping called a f . ) -contraction which has investigated by and Jungck ], Jungck Hussain [6 Song [7 and many

The set fixed points T is by F T ). point x X is coincidence point fixed point) f and if fx Tx ( = fx Tx ). set of points of and T denoted by ( f T ). pair f T is

(3) weakly [10 ] they commute their coincidence i.e. if = Tfx fx = ;

(4) operator pair if the F ( ) is -invariant, namely ( F f )) F ( ). Obviously, pair ( . f is a operator pair converse is true in see [11 ]. If T . ) is Banach operator then ( . T need not a Banach pair (cf. [11 ], 1]).

The M in linear space is called with q M . the segment q . ] = k ) + kx ≤ k 1 joining to x contained in for all ∈ M The map defined on q -starshaped M is affine if

1 — q + x = — k q + f x. all x M.

A space X Opial’s condition for every x n X weakly to x X . inequality

lim n → x n x lim n → x n y

holds for y ≠ . Every space and space l (1 p ) satisfy condition. The T . → X said to demiclosed at if, for sequence x in M weakly to and Tx converges to ∈ X then 0 Tx .

M be subset of normed space X . The set M ( ) = ∈ M || x u || dist( u M ) called the of best to u X out M . dist( u M ) inf y u ||: ∈ M We denote ℕ and M ) M )), set of integers and closure (weak of a M in . respectively.

concept of weak contractive has been by Alber Guerre-Delabriere [1 Actually, in ], the proved the of fixed for a weakly contractive on Hilbert In 2001, [ [2 Theorem 2] a generalization Banach’s contraction principle [Note weakly con-traction contraction as special case ϕ ( ) = -k ) )]. Recently, and Li ] introduced class of operator pairs, a new of noncommuting and it been further by Ciric al. [15 ], Hussain ,13 ], et al. ], Khan Akbar [18 ], Pathak Hussain [20 Song and [21 ] Akbar and [22 ].

this article, introduce the concept of ( f g )-weakly map-pings, and establish common point and best approximation for the generalized ( . g contractive mapping. results improve extend the common fixed and invariant results of [23 ], and Shahzad ], Chen Li [11 Habiniak [25 Hussain and [5 ], and Hussain ], Jungck Sessa [26 Pathak and [20 ], et al. ], Singh ,29 ], [7 ] Song and [21 ] the class ( f g )-weakly maps. The of fixed theorems are in diverse of mathematics, engineering and in dealing the problems in approximation potential theory, theory, theory differential equations, of integral and others [20 ,30 ]).

2. Results ( f g )-weak


The following is a case of [ [32 Theorem 3.1].

2.1 . M be nonempty subset a metric ( X d ), T be self-map of . Assume cl T M ) M . T ( ) is and T weakly contractive Then M F ( ) is

d T T y d f g y ϕ d x. g = d y — d x.

Corollary 2.3 Let M a nonempty of a space ( . d and ( . f and ( . g be Banach pairs on . Assume cl( T M )) complete, T ( f g )-weakly mapping and ( f ∩F ( ) is and closed. M∩F ( ) ∩F f ) ( g is singleton.

T x. y ≤ d f g y

where ψ [0, ∞ → [0, ) is semicontinuous from such that (0) = and ψ t ) for each 0. Then ∩ F T ) F ( ) ∩ ( g is singleton.

. Set ( t = t ψ ( ). Then (2.1) implies

T x. y ≤ d f g y f x. y (2.2)

α . ∞ ) (0, 1) an upper from right. M∩F ( ) ∩F f ) ( g is singleton.

T x. y ≤ f x. y — d f g y.

ϕ . ∞ ) [0, ∞ is a semicontinuous function right such ϕ ( ) 0 t 0 ϕ (0) 0. The follows from 2.2.

Sessa 26

In 2.3, if ( t = (1 k ) for a k with k 1, f = . then easily obtain following result improves Lemma of Chen Li [11

Corollary 2.6 Let M a nonempty of a space ( . d and ( . f be a operator pair M . that cl( ( M is complete, is f and F f ) nonempty and Then M F ( ) ∩ ( f is singleton.

following result contains Theorems of [11 Theorem 2.2 [23 ], 4 of ] and 6 of ].

Theorem . Let be a subset of normed [resp. space X T . and g self-maps of . Suppose F ( ) ∩ ( g is q cl T F ( ) ∩ ( g ⊆ F f ) ( g [resp. wcl ( F f ) ( g ⊆ F f ) ( g cl( T M )) compact [resp. T ( )) is compact], T continuous on [resp. id T is at 0, id stands identity map]

| | x — y | ≤ | f x g y | k ϕ ( | f — g | | (2.3)

for k ∈ 1) and . y M where . [0, ) → ∞ ) a lower function from such that is positive (0, ∞ and ϕ = 0. M ∩F T ) ( f ∩F ( ) ≠

| | n x T n | | k n | T — T | | k n | f — g | | n — | | x — y | ≤ | f x g y | — n ϕ | f — g | | | | x — y | — ϕ | | x — y |

for each . y F ( ) ∩F g ) for each ∈ ℕ, n . ∞ ) [0, ∞ is a semicontinuous function right such ϕ n positive on ∞ ) ϕ n = 0.

Corollary 2.8 Let M a nonempty of a [resp. Banach] X and . f g be of M Suppose that ( f ∩ F g ) q -starshaped closed [resp. closed], cl( ( M is compact wcl( T M )) weakly compact], is continuous M [resp. is demiclosed 0], ( . f and ( . g are Banach pairs and (2.3) for x . ∈ M Then M F ( ) ∩ ( f ∩ F g ) ∅.

In 2.7 and 2.8, if ( t = ( k — ) t any constant with 0 1, and = f then we obtain the results.

Corollary . [ ], Theorem Let M a nonempty of a [resp. Banach] X and and f self-maps of . Suppose F ( ) is -starshaped, cl ( F f )) F ( ) [resp. T ( ( f ⊆ F f )], T ( )) is [resp. wcl( ( M is weakly and either is demiclosed 0 or satisfies Opial’s and T f -nonexpansive M . F ( ) ∩ ( I ≠ ∅.

2.10 . [11 ], 3.2-3.3] Let be a subset of normed [resp. space X T . be self-maps M . that F f ) q -starshaped closed [resp. closed], cl( ( M is compact wcl( T M )) weakly compact either id T is at 0 X satisfies condition], ( . f is a operator pair T is -nonexpansive on . Then ∩ F T ) F ( ) ≠

Corollary 2.11 [ [23 Theorem 2.1] M be nonempty closed q -starshaped of a space X T and be self-maps M such T ( ) ⊆ ( M Suppose that commutes with and q F ( ). If T ( )) is f is and linear T is -nonexpansive on . then ∩ F T ) F ( ) ≠

Let C P M ∩ C f. g . where M f. u = M f ∩ C g u C M u = ∈ M. x ∈ M u

Remark 2.14 Corollary 2.5 [24 ], Theorems 4.1 4.2 of and Li ] and corresponding results [23 ,25 ] are cases of 2.12 and

x — ≥ x u | u | ≥ dist M.

If assume that T ( u )) weakly compact, Lemma 5.5 [ [33 p. 192] can show existence of z ∈ T ( u )) that dist( . wcl( ( M ))) = z — ||.

Thus, both cases, have

dist M u dist u. T M ≤ dist T M ≤ T — u x —

for all ∈ M . Hence z — || = u . ) and P M u ) nonempty, closed convex with ( P ( u ⊆ P ( u The compactness cl( T M u [resp. weak of wcl( ( M ))] implies cl( T D )) compact [resp. T ( )) is compact]. The now follows Corollary 2.13.

2.16 . 2.15 extends 4.1 and of [23 Theorem 2.6 [24 ], Theorem 8 [25 ].

Results for ( f g )-weak

Sessa 26
Sessa 26

Interesting Articles

Tagged as:

Other articles of the category "Sessa":

Twitter-news
Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

dima911@gmail.com

Born in the USSR

423360519

About this site

For all questions about advertising, please contact listed on the site.


Boats and Yacht catalog with specifications, pictures, ratings, reviews and discusssions about Boats and Yacht